Building on the Commonwealth Latimer House Principles on the separation of powers, the CPA Recommended Benchmarks for Democratic Legislatures provide a framework for excellence in Commonwealth parliamentary and legislative practice.

The original CPA Benchmarks published in 2006 comprised of 87 indicators and were drafted by CPA Parliamentarians representing different Commonwealth regions. The CPA Benchmarks were the outcome of a Study Group in late 2006 hosted by the Legislature of Bermuda on behalf of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) and the World Bank Institute (World Bank Group) with support from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the European Parliament and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI).

Reinforcing the belief that effective Parliaments are one of the principal institutions of any functioning democracy, the Recommended Benchmarks for Democratic Legislatures provide a minimum standard and a guide on how a Parliament should be constituted and how it should function. The CPA Benchmarks are therefore fundamental to the wider values and principles of the Commonwealth Charter, adopted by Commonwealth Heads of Government on 14 December 2012, which expresses the commitment of member states to the development of free and democratic societies.

Emphasising the position of the parliamentary system as a dynamic one, all Legislatures can be sources of valuable innovations regardless of their size or age. Different experiences, approaches and attitudes foster variations in practices and policies which stimulate innovation everywhere. Reflecting new parliamentary developments and practices as well as important international developments such as the implementation of the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The CPA Benchmarks were revised and updated in June 2018 by a second Study Group of CPA Parliamentarians representing different Commonwealth regions, which met at Wilton Park, West Sussex, United Kingdom. These updated CPA Benchmarks will continue to play an important part in developing the effectiveness of parliamentary institutions across the 180 Parliaments and Legislatures of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.

View the video above or click here to watch on the CPA's YouTube channel.

Individual Videos can be found below.

• (1) 1/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what are the benchmarks? - YouTube
• 2/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what does a legislature need to do to prepare?
• 3/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: who pays for the assessment?
• 4/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: how many jurisdictions have done an assessment?
• 5/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what are the political challenges of doing an assessment?
• 6/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: can non-Commonwealth legislatures do an assessment?
• 7/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: do the benchmarks cover everything? What is missing?
• 8/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: how do you approach an assessment before, during, after?
• 9/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what happens when you encounter sceptics?
• 10/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: do you tailor your approach to different legislatures?
• 11/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what if a legislature doesn't meet all the benchmarks?
• 12/12 CPA democratic benchmarks: what do you most/least enjoy about facilitation?

Since the updating of the CPA Recommended Benchmarks for Democratic Legislatures in 2018, 32 of the 180 Commonwealth Legislatures which make up the CPA have undertaken self-assessments. 

These include the following: Anguilla, Australian Capital Territory, Belize, Botswana, Cayman Islands, Fiji, The Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Isle of Man, Jersey, Kenya, Kiribati, KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho, Malaysia, Malawi, Maldives, Montserrat, Namibia, Pakistan, Samoa, Sierra Leone, South Africa, St Lucia, St Helena, St Kitts and Nevis, Tanzania, Tonga, Uganda, Queensland and Western Cape.